Tag Archives: aircraft incident

Root Cause Analysis - Incident Investigation

1960 Plane Collision over NYC killed 134

By ThinkReliability Staff

On December 16, 1960, two planes collided about a mile above Brooklyn, New York.  One plane – United Airlines Flight 826 – was in a holding pattern preparing to descend into Idlewild (now John F. Kennedy International) Airport.  The other plane – TWA Flight 266 – was preparing to descend into LaGuardia.  Since both airports serve New York City, they are in fairly close proximity.  The planes, too, were in close proximity – too close, leading to their collision.  In addition to the 84 passengers killed on the United flight (though one would survive for a day) and the 44 passengers killed on the TWA flight, 6 people were killed in the neighborhood of Park Slope, where the United plane landed.

This incident can be outlined in a Cause Map or visual root cause analysis.  We begin with determining the impacted goals.  First, the 134 total deaths were an impact to the safety goal.  The United flight crash resulted in a fire that affected more than 200 buildings, an impact to both the environmental and property goal.   The liability for the crash was assigned to both airlines and the government, an impact to the customer service goal.  There was another impact to the property goal because both planes were destroyed.  Lastly, the labor goal was impacted due to the rescue efforts of the more than 2,500 personnel who responded to the two crash sites.

These impacts to the goals occurred when both planes crashed after colliding.  The planes collided after their flight paths brought them into too close of proximity.  The United flight was estimated to be 12 miles outside its holding  pattern when the crash occurred, possibly because the ground beacon was not working.  The controllers at Idlewild were unaware of the plane’s position as planes were not tracked in holding patterns as it was too difficult to identify individual planes.  The planes were unaware of each other.  The visibility was extremely poor due to foggy, cloudy, sleety and snowy weather.  The United plane had lost the ability to use their instruments due to a loss of a receiver.  (The cause is unknown.)  Additionally, the controllers at LaGuardia (who were guiding in the TWA flight) were unable to reach the TWA plane to warn them of the close proximity of the United plane.

Although comprehensive details are not known about the crash, much of the information used to put together the investigation was obtained from the flight recorder (or “black box”).  This is now a main source of data in aviation accident investigations.  The evidence in this case was used to divide up liability for the accident very exactly – 61% to United Airlines, 24% to the US government and the remainder to TWA.

To view the Outline and Cause Map, please click “Download PDF” above.

Root Cause Analysis - Incident Investigation

Crash Causes Deaths at Air Race

By ThinkReliability Staff

Sad news is nothing new for the National Championship Air Races – there have been 29 deaths associated with the races in its 47-year history.  However, the ten deaths and dozens of injuries (some extremely serious) resulting from a plane crash and explosion on September 16, 2011 have brought attention to the safety of air racing.

Although full details of the causes of the crash and explosion have not been determined by the National Transportation Safety Board, we can begin a comprehensive root cause analysis with the information available so far by building a Cause Map.  First, we capture the basic details (such as the date and time of the incident) in the Outline.  Then we record the impacts to the goals.  In this case, there was a significant impact to the safety goal, considering the high number of deaths and significant injuries.  The customer service goal can be considered to be impacted because the spectators at the show were not sufficiently protected from injury.  (The FAA grants approval to air shows based on safety of the spectators from a crash.)   The remaining days of the race were cancelled – an impact to the schedule goal.  The plane was destroyed, an impact to the property goal, and the resulting NTSB investigation will cause an impact to the labor goal because of the resources required to complete the investigation.

Once we have captured these impacts to the goals, we can use them to begin the analysis.  The injuries and deaths occurred from the plane crashing into the VIP section and the subsequent explosion which resulted in shrapnel injuries.  The pilot lost control of the plane and did not have sufficient time to recover (as evidenced by there being no indication that he made a distress call).  It’s unclear what exactly caused the loss of control; however, the plane had been modified to increase its speed, which would have impacted its stability in flight.  Additionally, photos taken just before the crash appear to indicate that a portion of the tail fell off, but the reason why has not yet been discovered.  What happened to the tail section, and how the modifications affected control of the plane, are questions the NTSB will examine in their report.

Because of the goal of an air race – traveling around a course at low altitudes and high speeds – it’s no surprise that the pilot did not have sufficient time to recover control before crashing.  Given that these conditions are expected during air races – and appear to be an acceptable risk to pilots, who continue to race even with the high number of crashes and fatalities that result – it appears that there needs to be more consideration of how spectators are protected from crashes and the shrapnel that can result from the destruction of a plane.

When more evidence is gathered, more information can be added to  the Cause Map.  Once that occurs, the NTSB can examine the causes contributing to the deaths at the air race, and make recommendations on how future deaths can be avoided.

To view the Outline and Cause Map, please click “Download PDF” above.

Root Cause Analysis - Incident Investigation

Plane Clips Another While Taxiing at JFK Airport

By Kim Smiley

Around 8:30 pm on April 11, 2011, a large passenger airplane taxiing at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York clipped the wing of a smaller plane.  The larger plane involved in the incident was an Airbus A380 carrying 485 passengers and 25 crew members.  The smaller plane was a Bombardier CRJ and carrying 52 passengers and 4 crew members at the time it was clipped.

At the time of the accident, the Airbus was taxiing to take off and the CRJ had recently landed and was waiting to park.  The incident was caught on amateur video and it appears that the left wing tip of the Airbus struck the left horizontal stabilizer of the CRJ. No injuries were reported, but both planes sustained some damage.

After the planes made contact, the fire department responded as a precautionary measure.  Passengers were deplaned from the Airbus so that the planes could be inspected and information could be gathered to support the investigation.

At this time there is limited information available about what caused this incident, but the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) has begun an investigation.  The NTSB has requested fight recorders from both airplanes and also plans to review the air traffic control tapes and the ground movement radar data to determine how this happened.

Even through the investigation is just getting started, it is still possible to create a Cause Map based on what is known.  The first step is to create an Outline of the event by determining the impact to the organization goals.  In this example, the Safety Goal was impacted because there was the potential for injuries, the Customer Service goal was impacted because the passengers were unable to reach their destination, the Production Schedule Goal was impacted because the flight was unable to depart and the Material and Labor goal was impacted because there was damage to both planes.

From this point, Causes can be added to the cause map by asking “why” question. Missing information can be noted by adding a Cause box with a “?”.  Any additional information can be added later.  To see an initial Cause Map of this incident and the Outline, click on the “Download PDF” above.

Root Cause Analysis - Incident Investigation

Grounding the 737’s: SWA Flight 812

By ThinkReliability Staff

As new information comes to light, processes need to be reevaluated.  A hole in the fuselage of a 15-year-old Boeing 737-300 led to the emergency descent of Southwest Airlines Flight 812.  737’s have been grounded as federal investigators determine why the hole appeared.  At the moment, consensus is that a lap joint supporting the top of the fuselage cracked.

While the investigation is still in the early stages, it appears that stress fatigue caused a lap joint to fail.  Stress fatigue is a well known phenomenon, caused in aircraft by the constant pressurization and depressurization occurring during takeoff and landing.  Mechanical engineers designing the aircraft would have been well aware of this phenomenon.  The S-N curve, which plots a metal’s expected lifespan vs. stress, has been used for well over a century.

Just as a car needs preventative maintenance, planes are inspected regularly for parts that are ready to fail.  However, the crack in lap joint wasn’t detected during routine maintenance.  In fact, that joint wasn’t even checked.  It wasn’t an oversight however.  Often the design engineers also set the maintenance schedule, because they hold the expertise needed to determine a reasonable procedure.  The engineers didn’t expect the part to fail for at least 20,000 more flight hours.  At the moment, it’s unclear why that is.

In response to the incident, the FAA has grounded all similar aircraft and ordered inspections of flights nearing 30,000 flight hours.   Cracks have been found in 5 aircraft of 80 grounded aircraft so far.  However a looming concern is how to deal with 737’s not based in the United States, and therefore outside the FAA’s jurisdiction.

Root Cause Analysis - Incident Investigation

More on the Disappearance of Flight 188

By ThinkReliability Staff

In our previous blog about Flight 188 of Northwest Airlines, we discussed the first step of a root cause analysis investigation – defining the problem – and mentioned that a detailed Cause Map could be developed when more information regarding the incident was released.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recently released a report on what exactly happened to the flight. We can build off of the outline we already developed to put together the Cause Map, or visual root cause analysis.

First we begin with the impacts to the goals. Most importantly, the safety and property goals were impacted due to the potential danger to the flight. This was caused by the plane overshooting the destination. The pilots flew over the destination because they were distracted, warnings were not effectively delivered to them, and they couldn’t see their destination (Minneapolis-St. Paul), since it was after dark and cloudy.

The pilots were distracted by a non-operation activity. The two pilots were utilizing the scheduling software on their laptops, both of which were open in the cockpit (possibly blocking some of the flight display). Both using personal laptops and participating in non-operational activities is prohibited by the airline.

Some may ask how it’s possible that two pilots who were flying a plane – with over a hundred passengers – could be spending all their energy on another activity. Well, the pilots did not actually have any active tasks to fly the plane. The plane was on auto-pilot, and the one task that pilots ordinarily did on a regular basis (which would have certainly alerted the pilots to their position) was sending a position report. However, a dispatcher for the airliner had asked the pilots NOT to send a report, as the reports were burdensome and unneccessary.

Warnings did not effectively get through to the pilots by sight – either the flight display was physically blocked by the laptop or the pilots weren’t looking at it because they were distracted – or sound – the plane was not equipped to send audible message (such as chimes or buzzers) to the pilots, text messages sent to them were not acknowledged, and the pilots did not hear calls for them on the radio. The air traffic controllers (who were different from the air traffic controllers who had first had contact with the plane) did not know which frequency the plane was on, so only some messages got through. Because the pilots were using the speaker instead of headsets and were, again, distracted, they missed the messages.

Both of the pilots involved had their licenses revoked. Several procedures were not followed in this instance, and the FAA and individual airlines are working on highlighting the importance of these procedures. Reading about this incident (and seeing that the pilots’ license were revoked) will probably do much to highlight the importance of the procedures. Luckily, nobody was hurt for this lesson to be learned.

View the root cause analysis investigation by clicking “Download PDF” above.